Argumentation for Propositional Logic and Nonmonotonic Reasoning

نویسندگان

  • Antonis C. Kakas
  • Francesca Toni
  • Paolo Mancarella
چکیده

Argumentation has played a significant role in understanding and unifying under a common framework different forms of defeasible reasoning in AI. Argumentation is also close to the original inception of logic as a framework for formalizing human argumentation and debate. In this context, the purpose of this paper is twofold: to draw a formal connection between argumentation and classical reasoning (in the form of Propositional Logic) and link this to support defeasible, NonMonotonic Reasoning in AI. To this effect, we propose Argumentation Logic and show properties and extensions thereof.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Finding Admissible and Preferred Arguments Can be Very Hard

Bondarenko et al. have recently proposed an extension of the argumentation-theoretic semantics of admissible and preferred arguments, originally proposed for logic programming only, to a number of other nonmonotonic reasoning formalisms. In this paper we analyse the computational complexity of credulous and sceptical reasoning under the semantics of admissible and preferred arguments for (the p...

متن کامل

Propositional Argumentation and Causal Reasoning

The paper introduces a number of propositional argumentation systems obtained by gradually extending the underlying language and associated monotonic logics. An assumption-based argumentation framework [Bondarenko et al., 1997] will constitute a special case of this construction. In addition, a stronger argumentation system in a full classical language will be shown to be equivalent to a system...

متن کامل

Formalizing a Switch of Burden of Proof by Logic Programming

Prakken [2] argues that we cannot formalize a switch of burden of proof in legal reasoning either by argumentation framework or by nonmonotonic reasoning since argumentation semantics can represent any nonmonotonic formalism. In this paper, we argue that a switch of burden of proof can be formalized in nonmonotonic reasoning by formalizing burden of proof in a different way followed by the Japa...

متن کامل

Argumentation and Propositional Logic

Argumentation has played a significant role in understanding and unifying under a common framework different forms of defeasible reasoning in Artificial Intelligence (AI). Argumentation is also close to the original inception of logic as a framework for formalizing human debate and dialogue. The purpose of this paper is to draw a formal connection between argumentation and classical reasoning, ...

متن کامل

Nonmonotonic Inheritance, Argumentation and Logic Programming

We study the conceptual relationship between the semantics of nonmonotonic inheritance reasoning and argumentation. We show that the credulous semantics of nonmonotonic inheritance network can be captured by the stable semantics of argumentation. We present a transformation of nonmonotonic inheritance networks into equivalent extended logic programs.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014